Head to head · 2008 Honda Accord vs 2007 Toyota Camry

2008 Accord vs 2007 Camry

These records post indexes of 9.1 and 9.9. They share 5 usable evidence dimensions, but their relative index gap does not clear the 15 percent verdict rule. MotorCensus publishes no winner for this pair.

2008

P91 of cohort

Honda Accord · midsize-sedan-2006-2010

9.1

Complaint records1,520

Median mileage at the reported problem27,046 mi

Largest component groupBrakes

Distinct narratives1,505

2007

P99 of cohort

Toyota Camry · midsize-sedan-2005-2009

9.9 ±0

Complaint records2,885

Median mileage at the reported problem60,000 mi

Largest component groupVisibility

Distinct narratives2,871

0.8

Index points between the two records

1,365

Difference in complaint reports on file

Shared evidence dimensions

No call

Margin under the 15 percent verdict rule

The verdict · shared-evidence rule · Methodology

Too close to call

No published verdict for this pair: signal difference under 15 percent. These records clear the shared-dimension gate, but their relative signal-index gap stays below the verdict threshold.

Read the verdict rule

A comparison requires at least two shared usable evidence dimensions. For eligible pairs, the verdict applies a 15 percent threshold to the relative gap between the two complaint-signal indexes. It is not a mechanical failure rate or a complete reliability measure. Metrics below a sample gate show no value rather than an estimate.

Component groups · share of each record

Where each file concentrates

Failure files

2008 Honda Accord · 1,520 complaint reports2007 Toyota Camry · 2,885 complaint reports

Brakes

31%

Airbags

20%

Visibility

15%

Engine

14%

Speed control

14%

Structure

11%

Bars use a 0 to 50 percent share scale. Shares are of each record's own classified reports, so the smaller file's percentages sit on fewer reports. A zero bar means the group does not appear in that record's published distribution.

From the records · loudest cluster on each file